Ivan Panchenko believes that the main reason is that the transition

[tanjimajuha20]

According to Grigory Sizonenko, the situation with the reluctance of the commercial sector to switch to Russian IT solutions needs to be corrected, and as soon as possible: "Ignoring objective realities creates too high risks for the economy and security of the country, especially in the segment of critical information infrastructure. The state needs to create conditions that stimulate demand for domestic solutions. And not only by the stick method - tightening the responsibility of enterprise managers, but also by the carrot method - introducing benefits for those who consistently implement corporate programs for transferring IT infrastructure to Russian software and equipment."

According to Maxim Tkachev, there el salvador whatsapp number database are at least three factors that hinder the acceleration of import substitution processes in IT: "Firstly, there are few ready-made Russian products on the market that can be simply taken and integrated into the IT infrastructure. Existing domestic solutions still require some work. In any case, products must be tested for fault tolerance and compatibility, repairability, and issues with further support must be resolved before migration. The second serious obstacle is the personnel shortage. Despite the fact that in recent years we have seen an influx of entry-level developers, technical support lacks specialists of various specializations and levels of training. We should not forget that the transition to Russian solutions will require large capital investments from businesses."
to other technologies is long and painful, and businesses are trying to delay it: "Slow rates of business migration may also indicate other problems. First of all, about the sluggishness of thinking and "vendor lock-in" - a strong connection to the technologies of foreign vendors. Over the decades of their total dominance, the market has become firmly hooked on this needle, so the transition process often becomes very long and painful. The lack of qualified personnel for migration and mastering new technologies also has an effect. Against the background of these problems, many have preferred to postpone the "treatment" for later. However, the wait-and-see tactic has already proven its inconsistency, so migration needs to be launched before each domestic company is struck by personal thunder. In addition, there is a natural cycle of system obsolescence and technology upgrades. During this process, they will most likely choose import-independent technologies, even in the commercial sector."

Timur Badretdinov, Head of the Infrastructure Software Department at Syssoft LLC, is confident that the transition process can be accelerated by increasing the level of trust in the reliability and functionality of Russian products: "We should pay special attention to training and advanced training of technical specialists of companies in the field of setting up and administering operating systems and DBMS. This is the base, the foundation on which the product ecosystem will be based in the future. Pilot projects and feedback from end customers regarding the functionality that needs to be added to product development roadmaps are also important."

Kirill Simeon believes that accelerating import substitution processes in the commercial sector is pointless if they do not bring clear financial results.

Roman Gots is confident that import substitution will begin when Russian solutions become truly competitive: "Russian software and hardware manufacturers must compete with what the customer has today and offer the best solutions. Only real value and benefit can attract them to the side of a domestic vendor. And here software manufacturers already have a certain advantage - there is not a single foreign developer who would try to retain the Russian user. The transition to domestic products is a matter of time. The motives "because it is necessary" or "because they were forced" will not work in the commercial sector."