A self-written engine is neither good nor bad. For example, the Ozon online store runs on a cool self-written engine . But there are also engines for 5 thousand rubles, one of which Olga Kochkina mentioned above. Various troubles happen with them: The engine is outdated and the developer has disappeared.
A third-party developer charges more for updating someone else's code than for creating a mexico customer email list website from scratch. For any extension of functionality, you need to pay the developer. For example, if you want to connect AMP , you pay. And for popular engines, there are ready-made free or cheap solutions. If you have run into the functional limitations of a custom CMS, and expanding the functionality is expensive, consider changing the engine.
The designer's capabilities no longer satisfy you Constructors do not provide the capabilities that full-fledged engines have. You do not have access to the backend, which means you have to rely on the professionalism and efficiency of the constructor developer. You can develop a site on the engine yourself or involve third-party developers in solving problems. You can think about transferring a commercial website from a SaaS platform to a CMS in the following cases: The functionality of the constructor does not meet your needs.
The self-written engine has become irrelevant
-
- Posts: 503
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2024 3:25 am