Attempts to make corporate power invisible

[mahbubamim077]

In fact, it is worth remembering that even for those assets that are traditionally considered susceptible to protection by corporate secrecy, protection is not absolute. So much so that art. 206 of the LPI itself allows for the possibility of revealing corporate secrecy in court, even with all the appropriate guarantees. All the more reason is that we need to think of ways to make corporate secrecy more flexible in view of the challenges arising from data-driven capitalism.

It is also necessary to consider that we are moving towards a bulk sms new zealand capitalism in which power seeks to be invisible in every way possible, especially because, from the moment its exercise is not identified or understood, there is no way to attribute due responsibilities to it, which compromises the democratic project itself.

There are countless attempts to make corporate power invisible, ranging from corporate chains, often designed to make it difficult to identify who actually exercises power, to several other strategies, including technology and algorithmic systems. If a series of important decisions by private and public agents are being delegated to algorithmic systems, it is clear that corporate secrecy cannot represent immunity for the enforcement of the fundamental rights of those affected by such decisions.