What can we take away from this?
Posted: Thu Dec 26, 2024 9:41 am
This is the same type of signal that I've seen people like Cyrus talk about with onsite factors, that maybe sites that were overly SEO'd from an onsite perspective were doing poorly in terms of useful content updates. This is also something that we've seen Google talk about in historical patents, where maybe they're interested in sites that are ranking better than they should be given the size of the offline brand or the public interest in the site or business.
The key takeaways from these results. So, what can we take away from this? Well, in terms of why Google might do this, I think, that Google gets a lot of bad press when SEO works in some ways. It's kind of an unfortunate reality for wuhan mobile phone numbers database us SEOs. But you've seen a lot of stuff in the news, on different sites over the years, I'm sure the fact that this site is doing well is a sign that Google has failed, because obviously they shouldn't have, that kind of story.
It's also a very safe choice, especially when Google gets a lot of criticism or when they're concerned about AI-written content, for example. It's a safe choice for Google to promote brands. No one is ever surprised when they see a big brand high up in the search results. So that's kind of Google's potential rationale here. What you shouldn't take away from this What you shouldn't take away from these results. What you shouldn't take away from what I'm saying here? Here are some things I've seen people suggest in the comments on Twitter, and that's where or XI should be said.
The key takeaways from these results. So, what can we take away from this? Well, in terms of why Google might do this, I think, that Google gets a lot of bad press when SEO works in some ways. It's kind of an unfortunate reality for wuhan mobile phone numbers database us SEOs. But you've seen a lot of stuff in the news, on different sites over the years, I'm sure the fact that this site is doing well is a sign that Google has failed, because obviously they shouldn't have, that kind of story.
It's also a very safe choice, especially when Google gets a lot of criticism or when they're concerned about AI-written content, for example. It's a safe choice for Google to promote brands. No one is ever surprised when they see a big brand high up in the search results. So that's kind of Google's potential rationale here. What you shouldn't take away from this What you shouldn't take away from these results. What you shouldn't take away from what I'm saying here? Here are some things I've seen people suggest in the comments on Twitter, and that's where or XI should be said.