This analogy doesn't really apply

[rakhirhif8963]

Finally, we are seeing a significant shift in how IT leaders view enterprise open source from a security perspective. Not long ago, many of them distrusted the security of open source, citing the possibility that attackers could see it. They believed that you should not publish the detailed specifications of, say, your alarm system, even if you thought it was secure.

But to software, since many successful attacks are the result of blindly searching for vulnerabilities. Open source isn't always an obvious benefit (sometimes very few people actually analyze it), but what is clear is that many executives today consider corporate open source to be at least as secure as its proprietary counterparts.

How mobile users can securely access local and cloud applications
Alexander Kukulchuk, CTO of Cross Technologies | 06.04.2021
A few years ago, the issue of efficient and flexible access to resources and applications was not as complex as it is today. Applications and other resources were usually located in one place, such as the company's headquarters. Users rarely, if ever, took their devices outside the office. Remote access was only possible through office computers with the appropriate configuration and protection. Solutions using VPN tunnels could provide such a connection.

However, we live in a different world. Not morocco mobile database have the resources and applications changed significantly, but also the users who need access to them. The resources and applications that a user needs to do their job today are rarely in one place. Technologies are deployed in data centers and private and public clouds. The variety of technology delivery models - SaaS, PaaS, IaaS - further complicates the problem. If you represent the deployment graphically, you will often find that the diagram contains many separate islands of data centers and parts of the cloud infrastructure that are not always connected.